Help with Writing Assignments: The psychologist Carl R. Rogers advocated communication based on compromise. He felt a person should listen to the point of view of his or her adversary and come to a conclusion that takes into account this other perspective.
Our tradition of argument goes back to classical Greece when speakers tried to sway fellow voters in the early democratic debates over policy.
Building on this tradition of pro and con, our judicial system goes even further to emphasize the adversarial nature of many arguments. Many arguments build toward consensus. Another approach our authors don't describe is called Rogerian argument.
Based on Carl Rogers' work in psychology, Rogerian argument begins by assuming that a willing writer can find middle or common ground with a willing reader.
Instead of promoting the adversarial relationship that traditional or classical argument typically sets up between reader and writer, Rogerian argument assumes that if reader and writer can both find common ground about a problem, they are more likely to find a solution to that problem.
Based on these assumptions, Rogerian argument develops along quite different lines than a traditional argument often does.
In the introduction to a Rogerian argument, the writer presents the problem, typically pointing out how both writer and reader are affected by the problem.
Rather than presenting an issue that divides reader and writer, or a thesis that demands agreement and in effect can be seen as an attack on a reader who holds an opposing viewthe Rogerian argument does not begin with the writer's position at all.
Follow this outline and example to form a Rogerian argument essay. Rogerian arguments are named for the psychologist who developed the technique, Carl Rogers. Rogers' research on human socialization suggested that traditional debate format, Aristotelian, was doomed to cause more conflict than it solved. In this case, we talk about either anti or pro gun control argument. Cause and effect essay on gun control. In a cause and effect essay, you investigate an event – real-life or hypothetic – and conclude about the results to which this event leads. Allan Turner's Website - the first Person-centred website in the world. A collection of papers, books, students questions and a free directory of Person-centred practioners.
Next, the writer describes as fairly as possible--typically in language as neutral as possible--the reader's perceived point of view on the problem. Only if the writer can represent the reader's perspective accurately will the reader begin to move toward compromise, and so this section of the argument is crucial to the writer's credibility.
Even though writers might be tempted to use this section of the Rogerian argument to manipulate readers, that strategy usually backfires when readers perceive the writer's insincerity.
Good will is crucial to the success of a Rogerian argument.
Moreover, as part of the writer's commitment to expressing the reader's perspective on the problem, the writer acknowledges the circumstances and contexts in which the reader's position or perspective is valid. In the next main chunk of the Rogerian argument, the writer then presents fairly and accurately his or her own perspective or position on the problem.
This segment depends, again, on neutral but clear language so that the reader perceives the fair-mindedness of the writer's description. The segment is, however, a major factor in whether or not the writer is ultimately convincing, and so key evidence supports and develops this section of the argument.
Like the description of the reader's perspective, this part of the argument also includes a description of the contexts or circumstances in which the writer's position is valid. The Rogerian essay closes not by asking readers to give up their own positions on the problem but by showing how the reader would benefit from moving toward the writer's position.
In other words, the final section of the Rogerian argument lays out possible ways to compromise or alternative solutions to the problem that would benefit both reader and writer under more circumstances than either perspective alone accounts for. Rogerian approaches are particularly useful for emotionally charged, highly divisive issues.
The Rogerian approach typically downplays the emotional in favor of the rational so that people of good will can find solutions to common problems. But no argument, Rogerian or otherwise, will succeed unless the writer understands the reader. Rogerian argument is especially dependent on audience analysis because the writer must present the reader's perspective clearly, accurately, and fairly.
If you want to read more about Rogerian argument, Kate Kiefer has additional explanations and sample texts available in Eddy.The Rogerian essay is named for the type of argument it makes–the Rogerian argument named after psychologist Carl Rogers.
He believed that the key to effective communication lies in each side’s ability to negotiate differences in order to better understand each other. How to Write a Rogerian Essay: Quick Tips to Keep in Mind. Don’t Be. Aug 29, · Demonstrates the basics of Carl Rogers' theory of cooperative argumentation, contrasting classical Ciceronian argument with an example from Barack Obama's nomination acceptance speech.
Chisum Rogerian Argument, 15% of final grade, words Having analyzed a visual argument, a written argument, and your own writing processes, you will now be asked to present two opposing views on the same social justice issue, and, in whatever way possible, propose a . Argumentation theory, or argumentation, is the interdisciplinary study of how conclusions can be reached through logical reasoning; that is, claims based, soundly or not, on leslutinsduphoenix.com includes the arts and sciences of civil debate, dialogue, conversation, and leslutinsduphoenix.com studies rules of inference, logic, and procedural rules in both artificial and real world settings. Part I: Introduction--What inspired my argumentative response? For decades, too many high-school teachers have been instilling persuasive writing skills by teaching students the five-paragraph essay.
Allan Turner's Website - the first Person-centred website in the world. A collection of papers, books, students questions and a free directory of Person-centred practioners. I. I got Jordan Peterson’s Twelve Rules For Life for the same reason as the other , people: to make fun of the lobster thing.
Or if not the lobster thing, then the neo-Marxism thing, or the transgender thing, or the thing where the neo-Marxist transgender lobsters want to steal your precious bodily fluids.
Oct 23, · Easy Argumentative Essay Topic Ideas with Research Links and Sample Essays. Updated on November 28, A Rogerian argument is a strategy of how you write rather than a particular topic. Here are some ALS topics: Funny Argumentative Essay Topic Reviews: Rogerian Argument Essay; Rogerian Argument Essay.
Argument of Hr. Words | 7 Pages. Rogerian Argument: Tropic Thunder The movie “Tropic Thunder” is a comedy about five actors who set out to create a movie about a Vietnam veteran’s experience.
The article concludes with a counter argument portrayed as a last effort by.